[Ibogaine] Prohibitionists Hate Nature ?

Neil Giordano neilgiordano at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 20 19:42:21 EST 2010


by Steve Kubby, Sierra Times
November 10th, 2003

A new study published in Nature Reviews-Cancer provides an historic and detailed 
explanation about how THC and natural cannabinoids counteract cancer, but 
preserve normal cells.

The study by Manuel Guzmán of Madrid Spain found that cannabinoids, the active 
components of marijuana, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animals. They do so 
by modulating key cell-signalling pathways, thereby inducing direct growth 
arrest and death of tumor cells, as well as by inhibiting the growth of blood 
vessels that supply the tumor.

The Guzman study is very important according to Dr. Ethan Russo , a neurologist 
and world authority on medical cannabis: “Cancer occurs because cells become 
immortalized; they fail to heed normal signals to turn off growth. A normal 
function of remodelling in the body requires that cells die on cue. This is 
called apoptosis, or programmed cell death. That process fails to work in 
tumors. THC promotes its reappearance so that gliomas, leukemias, melanomas and 
other cell types will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing, and die.”

“But, that is not all,” explains Dr. Russo: “The other way that tumors grow is 
by ensuring that they are nourished: they send out signals to promote 
angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels. Cannabinoids turn off these 
signals as well. It is truly incredible, and elegant.”

In other words, this article explains several ways in which cannabinoids might 
be used to fight cancer, and, as the article says, “Cannabinoids are usually 
well tolerated, and do not produce the generalized toxic effects of conventional 

Usually, any story that even suggests the possibility of a new treatment for 
cancer is greeted with headlines about a “cancer cure” – however remote in the 
future and improbable in fact it might be. But if marijuana is involved, don’t 
expect any coverage from mainstream media, especially since mainstream editors 
have been quietly killing this story for the past thirty years…
That’s right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first surfaced, 
way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of Virginia, who had been 
funded by the National Institutes of Health to find evidence that marijuana 
damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three 
kinds of cancer in mice — lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia.

The Washington Post reported on the 1974 study — in the “Local” section — on 
Aug. 18, 1974. Under the headline, “Cancer Curb Is Studied,” it read in part: 
“The active chemical agent in marijuana curbs the growth of three kinds of 
cancer in mice and may also suppress the immunity reaction that causes rejection 
of organ transplants, a Medical College of Virginia team has discovered.” The 
researchers “found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers, 
and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as 
much as 36 percent.”

“News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent in this 
country. The news broke quietly on Feb. 29, 2000 with a story that ran once on 
the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article,” complained MarijuanaNews.com 
editor Richard Cowan , who said he was only able to find the article through a 
link that appeared briefly on the Drudge Report Web page. “The New York Times, 
The Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though 
its newsworthiness is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature 
destroys deadly brain tumors,” added Cowan.

On March 29, 2001, the San Antonio Current printed a carefully researched, 
bombshell of a story by Raymond Cushing titled, “POT SHRINKS TUMORS; GOVERNMENT 
KNEW IN ‘74.” Media coverage since then has been nonexistant, except for a copy 
of the story on Alternet.

It is hard to believe that the knowledge that cannabis can be used to fight 
cancer has been suppressed for almost thirty years , yet it seems likely that it 
will continue to be suppressed. Why?

According to Cowan, the answer is because it is a threat to cannabis prohibition 
. “If this article and its predecessors from 2000 and 1974 were the only 
evidence of the suppression of medical cannabis, then one might perhaps be able 
to rationalize it in some herniated way. However, there really is massive proof 
that the suppression of medical cannabis represents the greatest failure of the 
institutions of a free society, medicine, journalism, science, and our 
fundamental values,” Cowan notes.

Millions of people have died horrible deaths and in many cases, familes 
exhausted their savings on dangerous, toxic and expensive drugs. Now we are just 
beginning to realize that while marijuana has never killed anyone, marijuana 
prohibition has killed millions.

----- Original Message ----
From: Talleys <3Farrars at centurytel.net>
To: The Ibogaine List <ibogaine at mindvox.com>
Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 6:30:36 PM
Subject: [Ibogaine] Prohibitionists Hate Nature ?

I've observed of late, that more than a few of those people
who would criticize the potential of iboga and cannabis
and some other amazing plants,
not only show a disregard for Nature and its vast storehouse,
but also, almost a Hatred of Nature.

Their ignorant and infantile ramblings against medicinal botanicals
show Marked Deficiencies in whatever it would take to assist their
sub-par brains to perform up to some reasonable standard...

If it could, I wonder if Nature would Hate them back?

After all, the wise saying:

"Nature Abhors a Vacuum"



-=[) ::::::: MindVox | Ibogaine | List Commands ::::::: (]=-
(][%]  :: http://mindvox.com/mailman/listinfo/ibogaine ::  [%][)
-=[) :::: Change Account Settings :: [Un]Subscribe :::: (]=-


More information about the Ibogaine mailing list