[Ibogaine] small, well-designed trial

Nick Sandberg nick227 at tiscali.co.uk
Wed Feb 20 09:10:24 EST 2008

Hi Dana,


To be honest, I have some trouble understanding Alex's real position. He
takes a hard-line stance but it doesn't really make a lot of sense to me,
possibly not to him either should he really think about it. I think he's
done a lot of good work. I doubt he has some political agenda. Probably his
mind is just pretty cloudy and he can't really make sense of things. Not
sure really.





From: ibogaine-bounces at mindvox.com [mailto:ibogaine-bounces at mindvox.com] On
Behalf Of Dana Beal
Sent: 19 February 2008 22:07
To: The Ibogaine List <ibogaine at mindvox.com>
Subject: [Ibogaine] small, well-designed trial


Since the thalidomide disaster, the default position in medicine is that all
new treatments don't work and are dangerous until proven otherwise


What about risk/benefit? If it works, greater risks are justified. So the
question of whether there should be clinical trials or not becomes


Nick, does this guy oppose studying ibogaine or not?




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mindvox.com/pipermail/ibogaine/attachments/20080220/7a86f6f9/attachment.html>

More information about the Ibogaine mailing list